“This afternoon jurors heard from what could be called ‘Scumbag Alley’ we had all kinds of witnesses who were drug users, drug dealers, who knew things they didn’t tell police..who could have assisted in this investigation, or who actively took steps to help these defendants “…..I have to credit Jamie Satterfield for that phrase as she narrates events of the trial. However, that was not the inspiration for the railroad reference- that came from watching Sutton and thinking about her involvement and how her testimony was used as well as watching the rest of the witnesses who either knew or helped the defendants. http://www.knoxnews.com/videos/detail/letalvis-cobbins-trial—tuesday-august-18-2009/
As I walked out to the point in the fog last night I considered the lineup of the friends and lovers of the defendants, and thought of how they ended up even knowing people like this, what in life had brought them to want anything to do with the defendants at any point, as it seems there is no reward and only pain, misery and trouble to be had. I walked and saw various groups of people sitting on the beach, or also walking the cliffs, people peacefully hanging out together, kids playing, people picking up shells and rocks and I thought, you know, none of these people look especially ‘privileged’- you know- that whole BS about all White people having some special fairy dust on us that makes everything great- the concept that even when everything sucks, we can whip out our trusty container of ‘privilege’, and suddenly- everything is aglow again. Ha. Yeah. I was thinking of the people I saw in the Christian/Newsom trial, how I had not given much thought to the whites (small w) who testified on the “scumbag alley” day. They just didn’t ‘count’.
Then I started thinking after seeing one after another, and screen-capturing their pictures how these people got this way- why on God’s green earth would they have any contact at all with this crew on trial. Why would anyone? There were the obvious quick judgements- well, at least two of the women were big girls. Maybe they weren’t super-bright. Maybe no one ever told them -as some need to be told, they don’t get to things on their own- that they don’t have to go with whoever will have them- they have a choice. I thought of the talk show promoted meme that basically if one is heavy, that one has to go with anyone, and that blacks are not ‘hung up on weight like white guys’. Most women I have seen in this scenario are just being used, almost like prison girlfriends on the outside. In my mental associative map, I thought of that song by Offspring “Self Esteem”. A line says “The more you suffer, the more it shows you really care, right? Yeah…”. I thought of, of course, the OJ trial from Hell. Are we surprised Sutton was getting beat up? Sure, whites do that too, but it seems almost obligatory in the b/w configuration, and despite attempts from Murray Rothstein’s MTV, the whole interracial thing is played out. It’s just not ‘hip’ anymore. With the advent of the internet, there isn’t even an excuse re weight, as there are plenty of white guys into fat girls, as any dating site search will attest. But, they will say- Sutton wasn’t this type, so what’s with that? Of course there are some who are influenced by the degenerate media, but maybe that’s not it in every case, maybe there’s something else going on, going wrong. Why would all of these people want to associate in any way with these guys and why did they help them? Were the defendants calling in favors owed? Did the defendants threaten these people? It appears the ones who testified willingly helped them- but..why?
Defense Uses Sutton to attempt sympathy and tries to exculpate letalvis. Will the jury buy into this cheap trick?
#1-http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=96277&provider=gnews play video to right
Judeo-exploitation’s finest hour. The defense is trying to use the fact the defendant’s brother beat Sutton as a covert way to garner sympathy for the defendant under the thinly veiled guise of defense showing fake sympathy for the witness Sutton -while at the same time, trying to portray the brother , the one on trial now cobbins- as full of empathy and kindness for Sutton. “After the defendant’s brother beat you, didn’t the defendant put his arm around you , give you a hug and ask if you were OK?” Call her a race-traitor, in my opinion, race-traitor is the same thing as saying pathologically ill- but the defense is at least as slimy for using her the way they are. Therefore they are exploiting an abused woman with minus-degree kelvin level of self-esteem to prove their point, which only serves to prove mine– the ‘friends and lovers’ of these creeps have.. ‘issues’.
Thus, we gather that defendant participated – and admits as much- in at least the rape of Channon Christian, if not her killing, though I do believe ALL participated enough and failed to stop it that they are ALL as guilty as the next. Are we to think this letalvis was so empathetic towards Sutton, when he is busy raping and certainly not stopping his brother from killing (and there is no proof I can see that suggests he also did not participatein this as well) either Christian or Newsom, also White? I think not. Therefore the testimony of someone who probably wouldn’t know mental health or someone treating her decently from a hole in the ground is invalidated when it comes to Sutton being such a great judge of character. If she was, would she have lived among creeps like this-and with her CHILDREN ? She probably suffers from post-traumatic (insert whatever word comes to mind here) boyfriend syndrome.Her testimony is sad , but it doesn’t prove defendant was basically a good, but weak-minded guy who was just along for the ‘ride’. I don’t think so.
2) http://www.knoxnews.com/videos/detail/letalvis-cobbins-trial—wednesday-august-19-2009/ Video shows blouse upon which, besides Channon Christian’s person, defendant deposited his DNA. Not an act of someone empathetic to the plight of Channon Christian, who was bascially kidnapped, false imprisonment- whatever one wants to call it, and violated. Did his brother force him to do that, too? Was he oh so scared of his brother while he was leaving exhibits A & B? Is that to be lightly dismissed as though it ‘just happened’ all on its own? What is the defense going to say about that. ‘Yeah, well..it was a gang-rape- what was he supposed to do? Say no and appear rude?” There’s no excuse. Sutton isn’t really a witness for the defense, but more for the prosecution, as are all the weirdos trotted out that either were friends with or helped the defendants- here’s another one not pictured in my last post http://www.knoxnews.com/photos/2009/aug/19/63809/ It doesn’t matter if she was ‘involved’ with an one of them- she let them in- they were found there. What is this , an Underground Railroad for rapist/torture/murderers? Or is it the Underground Railroad of White Self-Loathing?
“It’s a gun”, proclaims lawson.
The other white, the male, who comes across in the videos like a meth tweaker- “Wernimont, an admitted drug dealer, is on parole for shooting a man.” http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/aug/19/christian-newsom-carjack-slaying-cobbins-trial-day/ ‘This is your brain on drugs’. This is your brain trying to function at a murder trial.
One usually hears this type of behavior simply described as being ‘race traitors’, which is true, but it’s more complex than that. That is the RESULT. To BE a race-traitor, one must first have a degree of self-loathing, self-repudiation– of wanting acceptance at any cost, or perhaps having been cast out of normal society- one turns to whomever will have them, even if those ‘accepting’ are using and abusing the person- it shows how central the need for some kind of ‘affiliation’ is.
Affiliation: ( from the online etymological dictionary) 1751, “adoption,” from Fr. affiliation, from M.L. affiliationem (nom. affiliatio), from L. affiliatus, pp. of affiliare “to adopt a son,” from L. ad- “to” + filius “son” (see filial). Fig. sense of “adoption by a society, of branches” first recorded 1799 (affiliate in this sense is from 1761). From ‘Filial’ : 1393, from M.Fr. filial, from L.L. filialis “of a son or daughter,” from L. filius “son,” filia “daughter,”
It has to do with having a sense of of family and acceptance- in the figurative sense of being part of a larger family, branches of one tree. In the case of these pathological whites, their sense of filial attachment is twisted, misplaced, as these defendants are certainly NOT their family in any sense. All of them were used by the defendants in one way or another. Why did they want to be the defendant’s ‘friends’ to begin with? Why would Sutton , an average white girl whom unlike the other white women depicted in the trial videos- is not 500 lbs- want to shack up with a lewhatever davidson? Are the children Sutton had living with her on Chipman street mixed and thus she feels she is already cast out of the White world? This we do not know, but it is a possibility. Mind you, Wernimont et al. are about what is to be expected- drug dealers, Wernimont had shot a man previously, as the link describes. So is it a case of jail birds of a feather flock together? Water seeking its own letalvis? But- what happened to bring this about?
There is always much talk on various forums about who is a race-traitor, common or celebrity, but virtually no talk of how they started on that path. Many Whites have less than picture-perfect family backgrounds, but don’t stoop to ‘affiliating’ with ghetto thugs. This is a subject that needs further exploration, as it is an adjunct of the whole multi-culti, ‘save the world’ propaganda that either promotes going out of one’s own group as ‘cool’ or as a humanitarian effort. There was a story not too long ago about a girl named Kate Puzey who was raped and murdered on one of these such ‘humanitarian missions’. http://silentconsort.com/2009/03/28/world-gone-wrong-lovelle-as-hero-uhuru-movement-insanity/
An example of affiliation gone right, is that Joan Berry, mother of Johnia Berry- came to support the Christian/Newsom families. The point is not whether her daughter was also killed by black thugs- the point is she came to support the family. She is acting in a filial way, albeit no one involved with ascribe race to it, but it is there nonethless. They have all lost children and she is reaching out to them in a true filial way and showing bravery in coming anywhere near this horror. Her supporting the families is a good thing, unlike the self-loathing whites that effectively lose their Whiteness in seeking acceptance, and/or hanging around with whomever they can mutually use once they drop down to the level of the Inferno http://danteworlds.laits.utexas.edu/ where murderers, torturers and rapists reside. I hesitate to pick level 7, cantos 12 and 13 only– decide for yourself.
It is not only the defendants who exist in this realm of hell- but those who walk with them- where there exists no real friendship, no real relationship- but do they acknowledge this? Are these race traitors able to see? Or have the descended so far into the darkness they are no longer able to discern the difference between darkness and light- between true affiliation and one’s own reflection in a river of blood? If it is true that ‘straight is the gate and narrow is the way that leads to life..’ than would its opposite be Hell? It could be said that Satan is the greatest multiculturalist of all. After all, he rules a place where anything goes, all are welcome- he ‘tolerates’ everyone and anyone- as long as he has your soul.
To get really radical about it, one could say slavery was one of the biggest race-traitor events ever. Or was it? Of course there were Whites who participated in it, but it wasn’t wholl controlled by Whites:
No matter that many of us, including my own people weren’t here for slavery- we as Whites colluded in it, and it appears that we by proxy colluded with jewish slave traders, thus either we were double-traitors, or were simply tools. Either way, Whites need to let go of the deeply internalized guilt that says “We brought this upon ourselves” , which is probably buried in the White collective unconscious. We have to get past the guilt-trip and into anger/action mode. It is said the first step in being able to do something about a problem is recognizing it and naming it. If we stay in this guilt trip mode, we stay passive and thusly let nature take over- and if we do this, and sta nice and polite and civilized about it, we will continue to be killed. White people in general don’t like violence on a day-to-day basis- why else have we invented these complex systems of courts and police rather than dealing with it directly as many of the eastern countries do? Because we want to be civilized. That works when most people within a civilization are as well, but we’re not dealing with civilized people here, we’re dealing with cobbinses and davidsons and colemans and thomases and boyds.
A few hundred years out of the third world, out of the savage jungle does not a civilized man make, I don’t care what you dress him up in. He doesn’t get it. We can’t ‘tolerate’ it. We can’t even afford it – already the prisons are overfilled with the uncivilized man’s sons and this isn’t our fault, because of profiling or lack of representation, it is because of deeds- no matter what the excuses are, poverty, neglected /abused kids, lousy schools, neighborhood violence, no daddy- these are problems that will always be ongoing because these conditions, these ‘problems’ are part of who they are, it is part of their racial memory, their racial make-up. We White people think we can change anything, fix anthing- we can invent the internet, we can go to the moon, we can cure almost anything- even other people, but we can’t. When we handed it over to Obama, we might as well have said “We give up, you deal with it now, O messiah of all that is black and white”…
These things are problems for US, but they aren’t problems when one is in a jungle tribe. Go tell a Masai about not being able to pay one’s cell-phone bill, or how the section -8 people are cutting one off,or the child welfare people are coming to investigate because you left your baby in the care of a 5 year old and he set the place ablaze or beat the baby*, or not being able to afford cool rims for the car, or how Jamal can’t read, or why is there a bunch of dead puppies in the garage, or people stealing other people’s stuff or how one can’t make one’s hair, face or body look like a White girls, or where is the baby’s dadd(ies)? Are the Masai or the Ethiopian or Nigerian going to think these are problems ? NO! We are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, and it ain’t working. This violence happens all the time in their communitay, it is far from an kind of ‘isolated event’- it may not have been planned- that only makes the case that there may not be an rhyme or reason to it-but it DOESN’T exclude racial animosity simply because it wasn’t planned. One mistake we tragically make is that we take the way we think and operate and apply it to them- but they don’t think and operate the same as we do. We’re NOT the same.
*I remember this case
Burris said he defended for free a six-year-old boy charged with assault for dumping an infant out of a bassinet and then beating him. Burris convinced a juvenile court referee to put the boy into foster care rather than the criminal system.
“Easton said the
6-year-old “has an attention span, if you are lucky, of three to four
minutes — or not even that.”
“He told me he has monkeys in his back yard. He cannot tell me the
simplest things, like what he had for breakfast,” the advocate said. She
said he cannot distinguish between the terms Mr. and Mrs.
Burris said he has kept in contact with his client, who is soon to be released from state care as an 18-year-old.