Christian/Newsom Case: The Underground Railroad of White Self-Loathing

 

 “This afternoon jurors heard from what could be called ‘Scumbag Alley’  we had all kinds of witnesses who were drug users, drug dealers, who knew things they didn’t tell police..who could have assisted in this investigation, or who actively took steps to help these defendants “…..I have to credit Jamie Satterfield for that phrase as she narrates events of the trial.  However, that was not the inspiration for the  railroad reference- that came from watching Sutton and thinking about her involvement and how her testimony was used as well as watching the rest of the witnesses who either knew or helped the defendants. http://www.knoxnews.com/videos/detail/letalvis-cobbins-trial—tuesday-august-18-2009/ 

As I walked out to the point in the fog last night I considered  the lineup of the friends and lovers of the defendants, and thought of how they ended up even knowing people like this, what in life had brought them to want anything to do with the defendants at any point, as it seems there is no reward and only pain, misery and trouble to be had. I walked and saw various groups of people sitting on the beach, or also walking the cliffs, people peacefully hanging out together, kids playing, people picking up shells and rocks and I thought, you know, none of these people look especially ‘privileged’- you know- that whole BS about all White people having some special fairy dust on us that makes everything great- the concept that even when everything sucks, we can whip out our trusty container of ‘privilege’, and suddenly- everything is aglow again. Ha. Yeah.  I was thinking of the people I saw in the Christian/Newsom trial, how I had not given much thought to the whites (small w) who testified on the “scumbag alley” day. They just didn’t ‘count’.

Then I started thinking after seeing one after another, and screen-capturing their pictures how these people got this way- why on God’s green earth would they have any contact at all with this crew on trial. Why would anyone? There were the obvious quick judgements- well, at least two of the women were big girls. Maybe they weren’t super-bright. Maybe no one ever told them -as some need to be told, they don’t get to things on their own- that they don’t have to go with whoever will have them- they have a choice.  I thought of the talk show promoted meme that basically if one is heavy, that one has to go with anyone, and that blacks are not ‘hung up on weight like white guys’.  Most women I have seen in this scenario are just being used, almost like prison girlfriends on the outside. In my mental associative map, I thought of that song by Offspring “Self Esteem”.  A line says “The more you suffer, the more it shows you really care, right? Yeah…”. I thought of, of course, the OJ trial from Hell. Are we surprised Sutton was getting beat up? Sure, whites do that too, but it seems almost obligatory in the b/w configuration, and despite attempts from Murray Rothstein’s MTV, the whole interracial thing is played out. It’s just not ‘hip’ anymore. With the advent of the internet, there isn’t even an excuse re weight, as there are plenty of white guys into fat girls, as any dating site search will attest. But, they will say- Sutton wasn’t this type, so what’s with that? Of course there are some who are influenced by the degenerate media, but maybe that’s not it in every case, maybe there’s something else going on, going wrong. Why would all of these people want to associate in any way with these guys and why did they help them? Were the defendants calling in favors owed? Did the defendants threaten these people? It appears the ones who testified willingly helped them- but..why?

Defense Uses Sutton to attempt sympathy and tries to exculpate letalvis. Will the jury buy into this cheap trick?

 #1-http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=96277&provider=gnews  play video to right

Judeo-exploitation’s finest hour. The defense is trying to use the fact the defendant’s brother beat Sutton as a covert way to garner sympathy for the defendant under the thinly veiled guise of defense showing  fake sympathy for the witness Sutton -while at the same time, trying to portray the brother , the one on trial now cobbins- as full of empathy and kindness for Sutton.  “After the defendant’s brother beat you, didn’t the defendant put his arm around you , give you a hug and ask if you were OK?” Call her a race-traitor, in my opinion, race-traitor is the same thing as saying pathologically ill-  but the defense is at least as slimy for using her the way they are. Therefore they are exploiting an abused woman with minus-degree kelvin level of self-esteem to prove their point, which only serves to prove mine– the ‘friends and lovers’ of these creeps have.. ‘issues’.

Thus, we gather that defendant participated – and admits as much- in at least the rape of Channon Christian, if not her killing, though I do believe ALL participated enough and failed to stop it that they are ALL as guilty as the next. Are we to think this letalvis was so empathetic towards Sutton, when he is busy raping and certainly not stopping his brother from killing (and there is no proof I can see that suggests he also did not participatein this as well) either Christian or Newsom, also White? I think not. Therefore the testimony of someone who probably wouldn’t know mental health or someone treating her decently from a hole in the ground is invalidated when it comes to Sutton being  such a  great  judge of character. If she was, would she have lived among creeps like this-and with her CHILDREN ? She probably suffers from post-traumatic (insert whatever word comes to mind here) boyfriend syndrome.Her testimony is sad , but it doesn’t prove defendant was basically a good, but weak-minded guy who was just along for the ‘ride’. I don’t think so.

2) http://www.knoxnews.com/videos/detail/letalvis-cobbins-trial—wednesday-august-19-2009/ Video shows blouse upon which, besides Channon Christian’s person, defendant deposited his DNA.  Not an act of someone empathetic to the plight of Channon Christian, who was bascially kidnapped, false imprisonment- whatever one wants to call it, and violated. Did his brother force him to do that, too? Was he oh so scared of his brother while he was leaving exhibits  A & B?  Is that to be lightly dismissed as though it ‘just happened’ all on its own? What is the defense going to say about that. ‘Yeah, well..it was a gang-rape- what was he supposed to do? Say no and appear rude?” There’s no excuse. Sutton isn’t really a witness for the defense, but more for the prosecution, as are all the weirdos trotted out that either were friends with or helped the defendants- here’s another one not pictured in my last post http://www.knoxnews.com/photos/2009/aug/19/63809/  It doesn’t matter if she was ‘involved’ with an one of them- she let them in- they were found there. What is this , an Underground Railroad for rapist/torture/murderers? Or is it the Underground Railroad of White Self-Loathing?

  “It’s a gun”, proclaims lawson.

The other  white, the male, who comes across in the videos like a meth tweaker- “Wernimont, an admitted drug dealer, is on parole for shooting a man.” http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/aug/19/christian-newsom-carjack-slaying-cobbins-trial-day/  Parolee Vincent Wernimont gave thomas, coleman and cobbins a place to stay and a ride out of town  ‘This is your brain on drugs’. This is your brain trying to function at a murder trial.

One usually hears this type of behavior simply described as being ‘race traitors’, which is true, but it’s more complex than that. That is the RESULT. To BE a race-traitor, one must first have a degree of self-loathing, self-repudiation– of wanting acceptance at any cost, or perhaps having been cast out of normal society- one turns to whomever will have them, even if those ‘accepting’  are using and abusing the person- it shows how central the need for some kind of ‘affiliation’ is. 

Affiliation: ( from the online etymological dictionary) 1751, “adoption,” from Fr. affiliation, from M.L. affiliationem (nom. affiliatio), from L. affiliatus, pp. of affiliare “to adopt a son,” from L. ad- “to” + filius “son” (see filial). Fig. sense of “adoption by a society, of branches” first recorded 1799 (affiliate in this sense is from 1761). From ‘Filial’ : 1393, from M.Fr. filial, from L.L. filialis “of a son or daughter,” from L. filius “son,” filia “daughter,”

It has to do with having a sense of of family and acceptance- in the figurative sense of being part of a larger family, branches of one tree. In the case of these pathological whites, their sense of filial attachment is twisted, misplaced, as these defendants are certainly NOT their family in any sense. All of them were used by the defendants in one way or another. Why did they want to be the defendant’s ‘friends’ to begin with? Why would Sutton , an average white girl whom unlike the other white women depicted in the trial videos- is not  500 lbs- want to shack up with a lewhatever davidson? Are the children Sutton had living with her on Chipman street mixed and thus she feels she is already cast out of the White world? This we do not know, but it is a possibility. Mind you, Wernimont et al. are about what is to be expected- drug dealers, Wernimont had shot a man previously, as the link describes. So is it a case of jail birds of a feather flock together? Water seeking its own letalvis?  But- what happened to bring this about?

There is always much talk on various forums about who is a race-traitor, common or celebrity, but virtually no talk of how they started on that path. Many Whites have less than picture-perfect family backgrounds, but don’t stoop to ‘affiliating’ with ghetto thugs. This is a subject that needs further exploration, as it is an adjunct of the whole multi-culti, ‘save the world’ propaganda that either promotes going out of one’s own group as ‘cool’ or as a humanitarian effort. There was a story not too long ago about a girl named Kate Puzey who was raped and murdered on one of these such ‘humanitarian missions’.  http://silentconsort.com/2009/03/28/world-gone-wrong-lovelle-as-hero-uhuru-movement-insanity/

An example of affiliation gone right, is that Joan Berry, mother of Johnia Berry- came to support the Christian/Newsom families.  The point is not whether her daughter was also killed by black thugs- the point is she came to support the family. She is acting in a filial way, albeit no one involved with ascribe race to it, but it is there nonethless. They have all lost children and she is reaching out to them in a true filial way and showing bravery in coming anywhere near this horror.  Her supporting the families is a good thing, unlike the self-loathing whites that effectively lose their Whiteness in seeking acceptance, and/or hanging around with whomever they can mutually use once they drop down to the level of the Inferno http://danteworlds.laits.utexas.edu/ where murderers, torturers and rapists reside. I hesitate to pick level 7, cantos 12 and 13 only– decide for yourself. 

It is not only the defendants who exist in this realm of hell- but those who walk with them- where there exists no real friendship,  no real relationship- but do they acknowledge this? Are these race traitors able to see? Or have the descended so far into the darkness they are no longer able to discern the difference between darkness and light- between true affiliation and one’s own reflection in a river of blood? If it is true that ‘straight is the gate and narrow is the way that leads to life..’ than would its opposite be Hell?  It could be said that Satan is the greatest multiculturalist of all. After all, he rules a place where anything goes, all are welcome- he ‘tolerates’ everyone and anyone- as long as he has your soul.

To get really radical about it, one could say slavery was one of the biggest race-traitor events ever. Or was it?  Of course there were Whites who participated in it, but it wasn’t wholl controlled by Whites:
http://news.ronatvan.com/2009/06/30/rothschild-jews-and-freshfields-founders-linked-to-slavery/

http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-black-holocaust-slave-ships.html

No matter that many of  us, including my own people weren’t here for slavery- we as Whites colluded in it, and it appears that we by proxy colluded with jewish slave traders, thus either we were double-traitors, or were simply tools. Either way, Whites need to let go of the deeply internalized guilt that says “We brought this upon ourselves” , which is probably buried in the White collective unconscious. We have to get past the guilt-trip and into anger/action mode. It is said the first step in being able to do something about a problem is recognizing it and naming it. If we stay in this guilt trip mode, we stay passive and thusly let nature take over- and if we do this, and sta nice and polite and civilized about it, we will continue to be killed. White people in general don’t like violence on a day-to-day basis- why else have we invented these complex systems of courts and police rather than dealing with it directly as many of the eastern countries do? Because we want to be civilized. That works when most people within a civilization are as well, but we’re not dealing with civilized people here, we’re dealing with cobbinses and davidsons and colemans and thomases and boyds.

A few hundred years out of the third world, out of the savage jungle does not a civilized man make, I don’t care what you dress him up in. He doesn’t get it.  We can’t ‘tolerate’ it. We can’t even afford it – already the prisons are overfilled with the uncivilized man’s sons and this isn’t our fault, because of profiling or lack of representation, it is because of deeds- no matter what the excuses are, poverty, neglected /abused kids, lousy schools, neighborhood violence, no daddy- these are problems that will always be ongoing because these conditions, these ‘problems’ are part of who they are, it is part of their racial memory, their racial make-up. We White people think we can change anything, fix anthing- we can invent the internet, we can go to the moon, we can cure almost anything- even other people, but we can’t. When we handed it over to Obama, we might as well have said “We give up, you deal with it now, O messiah of all that is black and white”…

 These things are problems for US, but they aren’t problems when one is in a jungle tribe. Go tell a Masai about not being able to pay one’s cell-phone bill, or how the section -8 people are cutting one off,or the child welfare people are coming to investigate because you left your baby in the care of a 5 year old and he set the place ablaze or  beat the baby*, or not being able to afford cool rims for the car, or how Jamal can’t read, or why is there a bunch of dead puppies in the garage, or people stealing other people’s stuff or how one can’t make one’s hair, face or body look like a White girls, or where is the baby’s dadd(ies)?  Are the Masai or the Ethiopian or Nigerian going to think these are problems ? NO! We are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, and it ain’t working.  This violence happens all the time in their communitay, it is far from an kind of ‘isolated event’- it may not have been planned- that only makes the case that there may not be an rhyme or reason to it-but it DOESN’T exclude racial animosity simply because it wasn’t planned. One mistake we tragically make is that we  take the way we think and operate and apply it to them- but they don’t think and operate the same as we do. We’re NOT the same.

another source:

http://www.knoxnews.com/photos/2009/aug/19/63854/

*I remember this case

Burris said he defended for free a six-year-old boy charged with assault for dumping an infant out of a bassinet and then beating him. Burris convinced a juvenile court referee to put the boy into foster care rather than the criminal system.

“Easton said the
6-year-old “has an attention span, if you are lucky, of three to four
minutes — or not even that.” 
“He told me he has monkeys in his back yard. He cannot tell me the
simplest things, like what he had for breakfast,” the advocate said. She
said he cannot distinguish between the terms Mr. and Mrs.

http://www.sfgate.com/c/a/1996/07/13/MN43907.DTL

Burris said he has kept in contact with his client, who is soon to be released from state care as an 18-year-old.

http://www.sfgate.com/c/a/1997/04/21/MN54864.DTL

http://www.law.fsu.edu/faculty/2005workshops/ward.pdf

  http://newsone.com/nation/rodney-kings-lawyer-takes-oscar-grant-case/

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Blogroll, Rants, Commentary and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Christian/Newsom Case: The Underground Railroad of White Self-Loathing

  1. JT says:

    I appreciate your blog and attention to this case as it has been a preoccupation of mine as well since it happened. Prior to the Newsome and Christian case it was the Wichita Massacre, Tiffany Nicole Long and so on.
    What to do, right? Having been unable to shake the daily thoughts of these often concealed black on white atrocities I have come to know severe frustration at the reaction of whites to these crimes.

    The thing that I cannot escape is the ongoing attention and outcry over the Don Imus comments and the Duke case at the time Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom were raped, tortured and murdered. After over a decade of these things rolling around in my head there is only one conclusion I can arrive at…our fellow whites are the number one enemy. This is where our attention should be focused. After all, how formidable are blacks when they are spotted a head start in every conceivable way, given full control of vast resources of city governments but still yet cannot come up with one positive example of success?

    Time to focus elsewhere for now, as you sort of hinted at, I think. If we create a culture where every man, woman, and child are all able and willing “Lion’s in the path” the rest will fall in place. It begins with of course, fostering awareness and ability within our own spheres of influence.

    The weak and feeble minds call for a “race war” when all that is really needed is to effectively manage the pests in our own environments in a self reliant manner. Hardened targets do not require candlelight vigils to celebrate their memories and mourn their losses.

  2. JT., I take issue w/ “our fellow whites are the number one enemy.” That is a strange way to phrase what you might have been trying to express, which is that so many of us have bought into the multi-culti anything goes, tolerate everything that trying to explain to others can seem like an exercise in futility. Being able to out-talk them, and think on one’s feet in debate is key. I have seen many various posts that outline “This is what you say to X argument,” but being as though you never know what angle they will take, you need to learn the structure of argument itself. I’m not implying here that you personally don’t already know this- just stressing the importance of understanding debate and the various types of logical fallacies.
    I don’t think of other whites as the “number one enemy’. The concept/day of race-war and TSTF is probably mostly fantasy at this point- maybe it wasn’t 50 yrs ago but the idea of this orchestrated special ‘day’ is improbable. What people don’t get is the war is already here, there’s no special ‘day’, it is happening in increments. From one post, and not knowing you, of course it is always hard to tell what a person’s agenda is when they start off making a statement like that.I’ll check back and see where you go with it and have my answer as to whether you meant it in the sense I explained it, or if there’s something else in throwing that out there. You want to go into those murky waters, bring it on.

    There’s a couple phrases you used I am not familiar with (will look up tonight)- “lions in the path” – biblical? “hardened targets” ?

    Creating a culture- or perhaps recreating it in some fashion- I’m all for that.

    One thing we have to get away from for sure is the stereotypical joke persona portrayed here in a ‘Whitest Kids U Know’ sketch:

    “c’mon Bill, race war!, you can be captain, I’ll be sergeant!” …

  3. JT says:

    Trust that I understand the nature of low intensity conflict, which is what we have and you correctly pointed out.
    When I said that our fellow whites are our number one enemy I would have in mind the likes of Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center and those of similar ideological leanings. I can assure you that I would sooner host a cookout for the enter congregation and membership of the Nation of Islam than I would offer a drop of water to Morris Dees as he died of thirst.

    How much air play would the nazi fetishists get if it were not for people like Morris Dees? The SPLC’s
    “Intelligence Report” is instrumental in keeping these groups in the public eye. It is my observation that they would simply go away if they didn’t recieve the attention they get from hand wringing whites who love to demonstrate their piety by bashing fringe groups that define themselves based on who they “hate.” The attention simply isn’t warranted.

    More to the point..who is it that insists that there is no race based motivation for the crimes against Channon and Christopher? Primarily other whites as far as I can tell. This is the problem.

    The reality is that there is no “race war” to be had. What there is is the potential for ideological and cultural rifts to explode into conflagration.

    “Lions in the path” and “hardened targets” can best be summed up by examining the Palestine/ Israel conflict. Again here is another low intensity conflict by definition (albeit of different nature and degree of intensity at times compared to what we are discussing.) The primary method of attack against Isaraeli civilians by Hamas and Hezbollah was not always the suicide bomber and bomb. Mass shootings in open air markets was the preferred method until Israeli citizens became armed and aware. After that the body count fell off to nothing and the tactics shifted because the mass shooters were gunned down before much damage could be done.
    The nature of our own conflict I doubt would escalate as theirs did. Neither is it necessary for every man, woman and child to become some Dirty Harry gun nut looking to blow away somebody for the greater good. How much different would any mass shooting in the United States hae gone if the prevailing thought was “so that others may live” vs. ” I just want to survive.” We cannot chalk it up to mere human nature as it is clearly demonstrated that many other cultures hold different values in this regard. Project that onto Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom and what conclusion would you arrive at? In their case it would have obviously been better to have have been shot and killed fighting tooth and claw in the street than to endure the certain personal physical and psycholgical pain and the subsequent pain on survivors. We cannot eliminate evil people in this world but we can make it known that to take up that path the evil man will have to risk everything everytime. A lion in the path is stumbled upon..it isn’t stalked or the stalker, but still yet an unpleasant thing to encounter when on a particular path.

  4. Mr. Roach says:

    This crime is one of the most sad and awful things I’ve ever read. As for the fellow travellers–including Sutton–I can only conclude that whites who get too deep into heavy drugs fry their brains and their motivation and their souls so much, that they lose all self-respect and are willing to do anything to get drugs, get used to hanging out with lowlifes of all races, and lose their conscience. I’ve seen this, but I’ve also seen it get reversed. Drugs are no joke.

    As for the crime and the media blackout and the defense, let’s just be glad that this first piece of crap was found guilty and his story of being a passive coward didn’t fly, not least because his DNA was all over that beautiful white girl’s body.

    This type of crime will happen so long as (a) black leaders and black middle class people (they do exist, you know) continue to identify black authenticity with the ghetto in a way they did not 50-100 years ago and (b) so long as whites do not think of themselves as the leadership class of the community, the numerical majority, the most educated, wealthy, and civilized cohort, with a duty of providing moral leadership and meting out force and justice as required to preserve order.

  5. themadjewess says:

    ‘with jewish slave traders’

    Hmmm, so the Portuguese people were all Jews…. And the black people that sold out their own people were Jews… Okkkk whatever…

    • Lord_Sidious says:

      I know that you don’t believe it madjewess, but you need to read more. Even the negros know about your kin. This is what I was trying to tell you before, some of your kin cause a lot of trouble and then the innocents get caught up in it too.
      If you can show us that jews DIDN’T own the ships and WEREN’T the traders, I would be more than happy to read it.
      I met a guy from the Dominican Republic who agreed that jews were the majority of the slave traders, just like your khazar ancestors and your ‘israeli’ kin today.
      What say you?

  6. themadjewess says:

    What say you? I am not “Khazar” I am Portuguese Crypto, with a family that practiced BOTH Judaism AND Christianity. Mom was Jewish, Dad was Iroquois/Christian. As are most good Jews, but you are stereotyping ALL Jews being ‘the same’ I know VERY well of the evil of liberal/Marxist/Bolsheviks- that HATE God.

    It is AGAINST Halacha Law for a Jew to EVER go into office in any nation BUT Israel, these JINOS are NOT Jews:
    http://www.mishpattsedek.com/Docs/MODERN_EREV_RAV.pdf

    “The Erev Rav delay the redemption much more than all the
    nations of the World”
    (Raaya Mehemna-Sefer Ha Zohar)

    What is the Erev rav? Who are they?
    The first time the Erev Rav appears in the Torah:
    “The Children of Israel traveled from Ramses towards Succot. There were about
    600,000 adult males on foot, besides the children. The Erev Rav also went up with
    them”. (Shemot 12:37-38)

    THE EREV RAV WERE THE SORCERERS AND MAGICIANS OF
    EGYPT WHO MOSHE TOOK OUT OF EGYPT IN SPITE OF
    HASHEM’S WARNING NOT TO TAKE THEM ALONG

    They call them “Liberal Jews” today, I call them satanic and Erav Rav, that is what they are- so, please dont count ME in with these satanic MONSTERS, TYVM.

    • David says:

      Iroquois/Christian,…… You have got to be kidding right? Those two are mutally exclusive,.. There is no such thing, you know, it’s like dehydrated water.

      As for the “good jew comment”,… you don’t EVEN want me to go down THAT path!

      “In order to hide the fact that they have become a special breed of humanity (i.e., parasitic), they have developed the monstrous lie that they are ”only a religion.” Their Jewish appearance is loudly denied, their Jewish characteristics are denied, their Jewish operations and depredations are denied, while those who mention these things are attacked by every Jew in creation as a “hater,” an “anti-Semite,” etc. ” George Lincoln Rockwell, WHITE POWER- Chapter 6

  7. themadjewess says:

    Oh…BTW, LS, MY family NEVER practiced ‘slave-trade’ we were indoctrinated with Catholcism for 200 years, from 1492.

    So, I dont know where you all got this info, but Jews in Portugal were burned, and indoctrinated for centuries, because of EVIL ERAV-RAV that were ACCOUNTANTS.
    Us little Jews ALWAYS take the heat for the monsters and no justice is ever served to the REAL evil-doers.

    • Lord_Sidious says:

      I don’t know about your family, but you sound like a descendant of conversos from sephardic background.
      As for your halacha, many orthodox deal drugs, yet that isn’t kosher either, is it?
      Not unless we understand the doctrine of tikkun olam. Then we understand why your kin can do what they do and still be observant jews.
      Mind, I am not saying this applies to you, as I don’t know you, but you rave on about neo-nazis and that type of crap, just like the khazar criminals.
      I agree 100% about the little jews getting the heat for the elite jews. Problem is, when we tell you about the evils of your kin, you put it down to anti semitism and crap like that, so some of you become accessories after the fact.
      I have no issues with innocent jews, if there are indeed any left, but I don’t tolerate any of you that cover the tracks of the scum in your community, any more than I do with my own. Criminals are criminals and there is no discrimination there, they all suck.

      • themadjewess says:

        Sidious;
        Pardon me, but I would like to rid this world of the Erav-Rav Bolsheviks faster than you.
        The Rabbis that did the dirty deed, do NOT in ANY way get a ‘free-pass’ from ME.

        Yes, many Jews really do get sick about the anti-semitism. Many don’t get that they bring this upon themselves, such as the “Tolerance, and Fairness” pigs and their museums where they give hardly ANY credit to this nation of Christians that liberated them at Dachau, and they USE what the Nazis did against THIS nation which is INEXCUSABLE. I have been to the Holocaust Museums, and have never met such a bunch of elite snobbish JINOs IN MY LIFE.

        All I can say is that I repent for what these people have done to our nation. I am so sorry, and yes, they do suck, as far as the leftist and even moderate Jews.

        I am SICK about what my people have done to this nation. I don’t even know how to ask for forgiveness. All I know is that I have ALWAYS been patriotic for America FIRST and I have LOVED this country, and NEVER EVER sought its ‘destruction.’

        I am so sorry for the pain that my people have brought to the Gentiles & Christians. I hope that you will not use what they do against me. I dont know what else to say, I cant take up for wicked people. Its against the law here, and also Halacha Law.

        I am doing a Youtube calling for the removal and repentance of EVERY Jew in power in the USA. I will cont to speak against the ‘rabbis 4 Obama’ and the ‘Jews 4 Obama’

        I dont know what more to say.

  8. Lord_Sidious says:

    Ok, well I see where you are coming from. You can see how anti-semitism is a self perpetuating issue, that is a credit to you.
    However, you really need to research the so called holocaust, which we refer to as the holohoax. Most of the stuff if based on a kernel of truth and that is all the truth in it.
    It isn’t even hard to prove the holohoax to be just that. Compare what Germans were executed for after Nurnberg and what the jews and other ratbags claim today.
    You will find that only 10% AT MOST of the story still exists and some of it comes from one or two ‘witnesses’ who have been proved to be liars.
    Once you free your mind of this, you will find it is the same anti-semitism crap story yet again.
    If you are genuine and I have no reason so far to believe you aren’t, then you are the type of jew that Adolf Hitler had no problems with.

  9. themadjewess says:

    I know the Holocaust happened, it was the greatest atrocity of the 20th Century, HOWEVER, more white Christians perished than Jewish people. The thing that made it bad against Jewish people is that they were targeted.
    Hitler, should have removed the nuisance Bolshevik menace, but ended up a madman and murderer.

    Sincerely, I would much rather have Patton say that he ‘has no problem with me’ and considered ME to be a good soldier. I am a patriotic AMERICAN, not German, but Shalom.

  10. Just to add to the comment I put up here http://silentconsort.com/2008/02/24/the-language-of-hate/#comment-2172 some of these op-ed hacks are actually using the fact that there were white scumbags involved with this crew as a means to try to imply ‘race had nothing to do with it” or to imply that there wasn’t racial animosity involved here? Come ON, the sad cases this crew USED does not argue against race-hate, it argues the case FOR it. All those whites with a small w were used and/or abused by them. That is just poor logic to state that various forms of usury and abuse somehow ‘prove’ this crew had any love for whites is ridiculous and disingenuous.

  11. themadjewess says:

    SilentCosort:
    They want to kill off all WHITE people now, in our own bloody Holocaust.

    http://themadjewess.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/i-see-horrific-race-wars-coming-to-harm-and-kill-white-americans/

  12. themadjewess says:

    What?
    So, an Iroquois person cant be a Christian? Are you kidding?? What about the scripture in John 3: 16 in the New Testament?
    What Jew hurt you so bad, Christian?
    I cant do anything more than try to apologize, but I am not taking THEIR blame, I am only a little person and a blogger, these are powerfully evil people, which I have NO part of.
    David;
    Your name is JEWISH.
    :)

    • David says:

      No, they sure can’t.

      The descendants of Adam later became known as Israelites. This racial stock of people comprised the twelve tribes of Israel. From the historical record we can follow these people from their Assyrian captivity to their westward migrations becoming the nations of Europe. They were White, and they lost their Hebrew language, heritage . . . and God . . . to the passing of time. The identity of these people, being lost and found, was prophesied in Hosea 1:10 “It shall come to pass . . . where it was said unto them, ye are not my people, it will be said to them, ye are the sons’ of the living God.”

      I could put this story of God and His choosing of a particular people on a fast track progression to arrive at the main point, however I doubt such and effort will be of any value to you. I won’t waste your time; here’s the theme that runs throughout the Bible: “I will walk among you, and will be your God, and you shall be my people” (Lev. 26:12).” For thou art an holy people (meaning racially pure) unto the Lord thy God, and the Lord hath chosen thee to be a peculiar (or one’s own) people unto Himself, above all the nations (or races) that are upon the earth” (Deut. 14:2). A lot of people don’t like that, including my own kind (fellow whites), and that’s too bad. This is so disturbing to some that they attempt to change God or eliminate Him altogether.

      The vast majority of the world is ignorant of the fact that there were actually eye-witnesses and written accounts of Jesus, His earthly father Joseph, and His mother Mary. Many of these written accounts are kept in the Vatican library, which describes what Jesus and Joseph looked like. These written accounts were compiled in The Archko Volume.

      In The Archko Volume, we can read where Gamaliel was sent by the Sanhedrin to interrogate Joseph and Mary in regard to the child Jesus. He says in regard to Joseph, “his hair looks as though it might have been dark auburn when young.” Later, he talks about Jesus’ description. “His hair is a little more golden than hers (his mother Mary), though it is as much from sunburn as anything else… His eyes are large and soft blue, his eyebrows very large.” This is a description of a people that does not represent the people we know as Jews today. This is not the description of Arabs, blacks, or any other type of people. This is the description of our ancestors – the white Europeans.

      Valleus Paterculus, a Roman Historian, met and interviewed Jesus and made a report to Pilate, who in return made a report to Caesar. Paterculus states, “One day in passing by the place of Siloe, where there was a great concourse of people, I observed in the midst of the group a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus… His golden-colored hair and beard gave his appearance a celestial aspect… ”

      Lastly, as we can see, Jesus was a person who resembled a particular race of people. Only one race has blond, auburn, or red hair, with blue, green, and hazel eyes. All these characteristics identify the white race, the true Israel. However, as our nation becomes more Judiazed and non-white, no longer will our ancestors in the Bible be depicted as a reflection of us, but will be depicted as a typical dark mideastern Jew.

      Tom Roberts, editor of the Catholic Reporter said, “artists should feel free to reinterpret Jesus for each new era.” The era that is approaching and coming upon us is a Jewish era, an era that does not reflect the traditional Christian morals and values of our people, but is an attempt to change the core values of our people in preparation of the one world church.

      The specific details of His birth, life, ministry, death and resurrection, all in fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy prove the deity of Christ. Some claim the death of Christ is proof that He could not have been God, however, His death was not due to any failure on His part. It was the will of God that He voluntarily suffer and die so to make reconciliation for the sins of the people, and to destroy the curse of Adam’s Fall, the curse of death. It’s a racial thing. The doctrine of the deity of Christ is the most important tenet of Christianity and, therefore, explains why it is so perverted by antichrist jews, communist spawned Jehovah Witnesses, Masonic Mormons and other satanic cults who have even tried to worm their way into Christian Identity.

      What makes the resurrection of Christ so remarkable is the fact that He raised Himself. He told His killers “destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19). Here’s the point:”If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. But, now is Christ risen from the dead . . . for as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (I Cor. 15:19-20, 22). Jesus could say “I am the way, the truth and life, no man comes to the Father, but by Me” because He lived the perfect life. No other religious figure in history has ever made these claims. According to Ephesians 2:9 we are saved by grace through faith; it’s a gift from God. There is no work, good intentions or rituals that we can build a relationship with God. Acts 4:12 is clear that there is no other authority whereby we are saved or delivered from unrighteousness.

      Anyone can claim to be God. The difference with Jesus is that His life is completely backed by evidence. There are over 300 messianic prophecies written before the birth of Christ, and all were fulfilled except those dealing with the second advent. What some people have difficulty in believing is whether or not Jesus rose from the dead 3 days after His crucifixion. This has never been done before or after Christ. Why? Because God only incarnated Himself in one person, who He defined as His Son. Much in the same way, He unilaterally chose one race to be in His image. Everyone must sit in the jury box and vote upon the evidence for the resurrection to know who Jesus really was. Jesus said that He alone was the way to the Father (John 14:6). He alone revealed the Father (Mt. 11:27, Luke 10:22). Jesus claimed to be God (John 8:58, Ex. 3:14), forgave sins (Mark 2:5, Luke 5:20, 7:48), and rose from the dead (Luke 24:24-29, John 2:19).

      When Jesus said He was the only way, He was either telling the truth, crazy or a liar. At the very least, most would agree that Christ was a good man. How then could He be good and crazy, or good and a liar? We Christians are not arrogant or stupid when we believe He was telling the truth. He was and is the only way. Those who are most opposed to the deity of Christ are those mongrelized jews who crucified God in the flesh 2000 years ago, because they are the ones who are insane and liars. Even today, there are so-called Christians who deny the supernatural phenomenon of Christ being the manifestation of God, and crucify Him again because they willingly refuse the faith necessary to advance the Kingdom of Heaven on earth. There is an emptiness in their lives that drags the body politic through the murky mentality of shallow theologies, theories and philosophies.

      Christianity is a relationship with God. It is trusting in Jesus and what He did on the Cross for you (I Cor 15:1-4), not on what you can do for yourself (Eph. 2:8-9).
      Don’t be persuaded by those who mock the idea of ‘letting Christ into your heart’ because those exact words aren’t in his Bible.
      The principle of cause and effect with God and man is very much a reality. The Bible is unlike any other book, although it is just a book, as the Mona Lisa is just a painting, even though it’s a masterpiece! So, too, is a picture of lightening different than actually being struck by a bolt of lightening. The Bible, as a book, isn’t the Word of God, although it contains the revelation of God. More accurately, Jesus is the Word (John 1:14) and more fully God’s revelation of Himself (Luke 2:32, John 14:9). You have to think outside the box to prove all things with the living word, not just ink on paper. What good are musical notes if they’re not played on an instrument? The Bible itself can’t prove God exists anymore than science can disprove His existence. Man doesn’t have the intellectual capacity to understand the infinity of God, otherwise he’d go out and start making his own universe.

      Man can argue that God and Jesus Christ are not the same and, in so doing, put limitations on something that is unlimited. Luke 1:37 tells us “with God nothing shall be impossible”. Does that mean He can turn Himself into a flesh and bone man? Yes. Another scripture says “God is a Spirit”. Does that mean that God is only some kind of invisible gas? No. Man is lost trying to figure this out with only 1/10th of his brain. The Bible records the stories of people who did not have an appreciation of divine purpose; who were nevertheless touched by God. People who have read these accounts have connected for themselves the reality and inspiration of God. Reading and studying the Bible is good, but the Kingdom goes beyond scholastic preoccupation.” The Kingdom of God is not in word, but in power” (I Cor. 4:19). For our lost racist kinfolk, that reads ‘White Power’.

      The fact is Jesus Christ was a white man. He came to the lost sheep of the House of Israel as their Kinsman Redeemer. Can anyone of any race follow the teachings of Jesus Christ? Yes, but it doesn’t make them kinsmen. It doesn’t give them the authority to change the historical and correct image of Jesus’ white racial background into their own. And saying that Jesus Christ is white doesn’t make a person an evil hater any more than it would were they to say that George Washington or Queen Elizabeth is white. They are merely stating the facts.

      I can assure you my name is not derived from any sort of yiddish-jew language.

      From the Hebrew name דָּוִד (Dawid), which is derived from Hebrew דוד (dwd) meaning “beloved”. The first recorded person with the name is David – the second and greatest of the kings of Israel, ruling in the 10th century BC. Several stories about him are told in the Old Testament, including his defeat of Goliath, a giant Philistine. Jesus was descended from him. This name has been used in Britain since the Middle Ages. It has been especially popular in Wales, where it is used in honour of the 5th-century patron saint of Wales (also called Dewi), as well as in Scotland, where it was borne by two kings.

  13. Haven’t we had enough with these made-up terms like ‘racist’ ‘anti-semitic’ ‘hater’ ‘neo-Nazi’, etc? I remember posting on SF years back I was sick of having to define myself in terms of other’s scripts and that while ‘racism’ is a ‘social construct’- race and race loyalty- is not.

  14. themadjewess says:

    “Haven’t we had enough with these made-up terms like ‘racist’ ‘anti-semitic’ ‘hater’ ‘neo-Nazi’, etc?”
    ————————

    Yes, I get called a Jew-Nazi for standing against this multicultural BS. I get called a ‘racist’ incessively, b/c I believe that people prefer segregation, because it is NATURAL.
    But-I AM a hater, I HATE the people that have destroyed my country.

  15. “incessively”?

    Maybe you meant ‘incessantly’? I have tried to save you because watching your hysteria/neurosis was vaguely entertaining, but committing written offenses like that is not going to put you to the top of the ‘list’. Can you play the violin? Sing? Tell jokes?

  16. rev2939 says:

    H120
    אדם
    ‘âdâm
    aw-dawm’
    From H119; ruddy, that is, a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc)

    H119
    אדם
    ‘âdam
    aw-dam’
    To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

    That is from the HEBREW, not the “jewbrew”.

    IE: – “WHITE or FAIR” (as the original english definition of FAIR states.)

    IE: Caucasian – not mongoloid ashkenazi

    Silent consort, I used to live in the Albany,Berkeley, and Kensington (respectively) parts of the bay area – which I departed from in 2007. I came across your blog via incogman, and after checking out your “6000 ft” article, was inspired to comment.I spent 1 summer and 2 thanksgiving holidays in the Sierras, and did catch a glimpse of a couple of “skins” up there as well – though opportunity didn’t present itself for conversation.BTW – I prefer the smaller Donner lake area – just my taste – and have had a couple of coffees in the very same place you illustrated. I enjoyed that article on a few levels, though it reminded me of the sadness I sometimes feel for those our kinsfolk – who are bereft of the knowledge and HOLY spirit of our GOD and creator,which happens NOT to be “odin”.

    Since my “awakening” – not to be too “David Duke” about it (ha! ha!) I have had opportunity to converse with a couple of skinheads down here in Texas on the aforementioned subject matter of the last paragraph,and at least the seeds were planted.I appreciated David’s comments as well in regards to addressing the antichrist jewess spew,and communicating to our kinfolk the TRUTH via the scriptures.

    Titus 1:13-15 13:This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;

    14:Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

    I see that “themadjewbag” sure gets around,and like the jewbonic plague she is, she will no doubt continue being “incessantly” “incessive”.Can she play the violin? – yes indeed, and I’m sure you have heard her “smash hit” – “the small jews” many times,or how about her song OBAMA IS A MUUUUZZZZIIIEEE! (the hasbara mix) ? Speaking of “small jews” have you been to UC BERKELEY recently? – it’s well within the realm of possibility that you have – I used to see subversive “small jews” all over the shop doing their sayanim dirties, and there are nests/covens of the vipers living all around it’s grounds as you well know – with nary a “BIG jew” (Rothschilds – et al) in sight.

    It is refreshing to see yet another white woman eloquently speak out for our race, keep up the fight.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s